WEIRD: the podcast
WEIRD: the podcast
EPISODE 4 - The Walz-Vance debate unpacked: consensus and conflict in middle America
0:00
Current time: 0:00 / Total time: -41:31
-41:31

EPISODE 4 - The Walz-Vance debate unpacked: consensus and conflict in middle America

Behind the veneer of civility that cloaked the 2 October US vice presidential debate, there are radical differences that can't be reconciled.

In this episode:

- Fact-checking and post-truth: the CBS News debate moderators couldn't fact-check the vice presidential candidates, but, weirdly enough, candidates were encouraged to fact-check each other.

- JD Vance, like Trump, blames all American problems on immigration. Tim Walz reiterates Harris' "tough" stance on borders (a move to the right), while rightly denouncing the dehumanisation of Republican anti-immigrant propaganda.

- In a different dynamic from the Harris-Trump debate, Vance and Walz try to be nice to each other, while they both talk to rural and working class voters in middle America. Regional identity politics requires that they acknowledge their common roots, even as they disagree on pretty much everything else.

- Mainstreaming far right ideas through "civil" debate won't make them any less dangerous. Vance's polished salesman's style is a thin veil for his extreme views.

- Advocating for a transversal alliance of free speech warriors, Vance accuses Harris of "censorship", while Walz refocuses the attention on Trump's undemocratic attitude and the dangers of a repeat of the January 6 Capitol Hill riots.

This episode was written and produced by Vito Laterza & Louis Römer.

You can find us on several podcast platforms and social media channels here.

You can use this RSS feed to get new episodes in the podcast app of your choice: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2398387.rss

Discussion about this podcast

WEIRD: the podcast
WEIRD: the podcast
A podcast offering a global, unconventional perspective on the US election. Hosted by anthropologists Vito Laterza & Louis Römer.